Home>5150>forced-9-30-02
Bill Had To
Balance Safety Against Civil Rights
September 30, 2002
/ The Union
Life
had already turned upside down for Nick and Amanda Wilcox.
Their daughter, Laura, was among three people
slain in the Jan. 10, 2001, shooting spree that also left three injured.
Witnesses said the alleged gunman, afflicted with schizophrenia, had turned
increasingly delusional and threatening weeks before mayhem struck Nevada
County.
In making sense of it all, the Wilcoxes sought
reason and purpose where many think neither exist. At the Capitol, bills
often wallow in debate, side deals and amendments until they faintly
resemble their original form.
But the Penn Valley couple immersed themselves in
the process anyway. They dropped in on lawmakers and aides and spoke to
legislative committees. They wrote letters and made phone calls.
Not long into the process, they were disillusioned
with Sacramento.
"There is a lot of ugliness that goes on.
There's a lot of personal ego and face-saving maneuvering," Nick Wilcox
said. But, "in the end, I think this bill represented a really good
compromise."
The bill became Laura's Law, which Gov. Gray Davis
signed Saturday.
Backers say it strikes a balance between mandating
outpatient mental health treatment for the dangerous few who refuse it and
preserving their civil rights.
But the law offers no
direct funding and opponents, particularly mental health clients, say the
law stigmatizes the mentally ill and will create distrust.
"We're not more violent than the general
society, but that's how it was promoted," said Sally Zinman of the
California Network of Mental Health Clients.
Laura Wilcox was 19 and a pacifist who spoke with
concern of the clients who visited the Nevada County mental health clinic.
Like her parents, she was a member of the Quakers, a politically active
religious group and a lobbying force in Sacramento.
Home on holiday break, she was working at the
clinic's front desk on Jan. 10, 2001, when client Scott Thorpe allegedly
burst into the lobby and began firing his handgun. Authorities say he next
drove to Lyon's Restaurant and fired again.
Wilcox, Pearlie Mae Feldman and Mike Markle died.
Judith Edzards and Rick Senuty were wounded by gunfire, and Daisy Switzer
was seriously hurt leaping from a second-floor window at the clinic.
By then, Assembly Bill 1421 was already many years
in the making. The Wilcoxes met with its author, Assemblywoman Helen
Thomson, D-Davis, and soon the bill was named after Laura.
"They've been instrumental in putting a face
on the need for reform, and I have great admiration for them, because
another family in another circumstance might have been vindictive,"
said Carla Jacobs, a board director for the National Alliance for the
Mentally Ill who lives in Orange County.
Reform efforts have decades-old roots.
In 1967, liberals and conservatives joined in
passing the Lanterman Petris Short Act signed by then-Gov. Ronald Reagan. It
freed the mentally ill from state psychiatric hospitals and made voluntary
mental health care the rule in most cases.
Indefinite hospital stays were replaced by the
72-hour hold, which can only be extended through a court process of checks
and balances.
It was both a civil rights victory and an
immediate cost saver, and the forces that got it passed were dubbed
"the Unholy Alliance" because of what happened - or didn't happen
- next.
Many of those freed never got treatment again.
Some became street people.
"The money never followed, and the amount of
money that's available is less and less each year," Nick Wilcox said.
A lawmaker who voted for the LPs Act is Sen. John
Burton, D-San Francisco, the state Senate president pro tempore. Among the
most powerful politicians in the Capitol, he's blocked past reform attempts,
including earlier versions of Thomson's bill.
The Wilcoxes knew when they began their lobbying
that getting anything passed meant persuading Burton.
Nick Wilcox, who works in Sacramento, tried to
schedule meetings with the senator. When that failed, he repeatedly stopped
by Burton's office until, one day, there the senator stood.
"His face turned gray, so he knows who we
are," Nick Wilcox said. "I see him all over Sacramento, and we
kind of nod to each other."
The two chatted briefly, and Burton assigned an
aide to continue the conversation as he left for another engagement. Efforts
to interview Burton for this story were unsuccessful.
Burton's chief fiscal policy adviser, Diane
Cummins, said the senator's long-held stance is a matter of civil rights and
limited money for the voluntary treatment programs he supports.
"From his perspective, the system only funds
about half the people who need services, so to jump from that to involuntary
services is inconsistent," she said.
But something changed this year. While Burton
voted against AB 1421, he did allow the bill to reach the Senate floor. It
had already passed the Assembly 65-1 last year.
A key to that, said Thomson's chief of staff,
Craig Reynolds, was "John Burton finally becoming engaged in the
discussion, as opposed to merely dismissing the idea."
Burton even arranged a closed-door meeting to make
it a workable law after it was gutted by the Senate Health and Human
Services Committee.
"I wouldn't call that a negotiation. It was a
meeting," said Cummins, who met with Thomson staffers and others.
Much of the bill's intent was restored. The talks
strengthened patients' civil rights and modified the criteria for qualifying
clients for treatment.
It advanced to the Senate Judiciary Committee,
where Amanda Wilcox spoke last month.
Quakers historically have advocated civil rights,
including those of the mentally ill, she told the lawmakers.
"We believe that the civil rights of mental
health clients should be respected and protected. However, we also believe
Laura had a more fundamental right to life and we, as parents, had a right
to see our daughter grow into adulthood and watch her fulfill her dreams.
"Surely there must be a balance between
individual freedoms and public safety. We believe AB 1421 strikes such a
balance."
The judiciary committee passed the bill, as did
the appropriations committee later.
That put it before the last major hurdle - the
Senate floor. It passed 27-8, with Burton in the "nay" group.
While the law was named after Laura Wilcox, it's
just as much linked to Scott Thorpe and others accused of violent acts
spurred by psychosis.
"The Thorpe case is an example of waiting for
danger until it's just too late," NAMI's Jacobs said.
But how predictable are violent outbursts?
Zinman, whose clients' group joined an anti-AB
1421 rally a week before the governor signed the bill, drew a comparison to
the movie "Minority Report," where Tom Cruise's character fights
crimes before they occur.
"Even psychiatrists feel you could not
project those things," she said.
But in Thorpe's case, the Wilcoxes have maintained
his alleged actions were "predictable and preventable."
Amanda Wilcox told the Senate Judiciary Committee
that Thorpe was stalking a clinic employee, kept an arsenal of weapons at
his home, refused to take his medication, and was a source of concern among
his family members.
He was deemed incompetent to stand trial and sent
to state hospitals in Atascadero and Napa. His mental status will be
addressed again this week in Nevada County Superior Court.
"We believe that he would have qualified for
assisted outpatient treatment and that if a program similar to that
contemplated by AB 1421 had been in place, Laura would be alive today,"
she said.
But just how many counties participate remains to
be seen, because none will get state money. The law lost its projected state
funding of $50 million because of state budget woes.
Reynolds, Thomson's chief of staff, hopes counties
make cost comparisons.
"We think there will be considerable savings
from reducing jail placements, hospitalizations, and the revolving door
through the judicial system," he said. "There's going to be
savings that offset those costs significantly."
Laura's Law provisions
--
Allows counties to provide court-ordered
outpatient treatment or assisted outpatient treatment for the seriously
mentally ill.
-- Court must find the patient is likely to become
dangerous or gravely disabled without the ordered treatment.
-- Court can order treatment for up to six months.
-- Patient must have a history of not complying
with treatment.
-- Patient's parents, spouse, sibling, adult child
or roommate can request a petition for outpatient treatment, as can mental
health workers and police.
-- Provides no funding, and the program is
optional for counties.
-- Expires in 2008 unless lawmakers extend it.
-Source: www.leginfo.ca.gov
|
Invest in Your
Mind.
Visit Our Book
Section |
Kathi's Mental Health Review
Copyright © Kathi
Stringer & Respective Authors.
Site Powered By
Kathi Stringer
Online web site design |
|