Ahead of Its Time: The
Stockton State Mental Asylum from the 1890’s to 1920’s
By Dave Smith and Justin Jones
It was early April; two men in a rowboat approached me
while I was floating in the frigid Stockton Channel. As the
two men approached, a look of astonishment came upon their
faces as they saw I was floating on my back, fully clothed.
The two men pulled me into the rowboat. As they dragged me
in the boat I offered no resistance, but admitted I would
rather stay in the water because I was looking for my
sister. When the men asked me why I was looking for my
sister in the Stockton Channel, I replied that my sister had
drowned at a going away party in my honor before I left
Boston. Not knowing what to do, the men took me to the local
authorities.
As the examiner looked at me, I could see that his eyes were
filled
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
Entrance to the Stockton State Asylum's male
department
Courtesy of the Bank of
Stockton Historical Photo Collection |
| |
with disbelief. I told him that I was looking for my sister
because she lived at the bottom of the pretty water in a
beautiful house of pearls. The examiner then asked if my
sister wanted me to live with her at the bottom of the
water. I replied with great vigor that she was excited at
the idea of me coming to live with her.
I later found that the examiner had consulted with other
physicians, when they concluded that I possessed the
symptoms of acute melancholia. Acute melancholia is a
disorder in which a person suffers from depression due to a
recently witnessed trauma. I was immediately admitted. The
bed I slept on was made of straw and very uncomfortable, but
I slept nonetheless.
I awoke the next morning in a horrific sweat, only to find
that my experiences were not a dream, but reality. I was
actually in the uncomfortable bed in an off-white room. The
room was very dull in appearance with only the bed and a
small table next to it. A window to my left had a view of a
vast field, empty with the morning dew still covering the
grass. An attendant came through the door assuring me that
everything would be all right and that it was time for
breakfast. Breakfast was a very foul tasting slop
accompanied by cold coffee and stale bread. After breakfast
I learned that it was my day to go out into the yard. The
yard was a 10-acre field with gardens, flowerbeds, and a
grove of oak trees. The attendant informed me that I was not
to go beyond the limits of the hospital. It was at this
instant that I finally realized I was a member of the
Stockton State Mental Asylum.
At 12 o’clock noon dinner was served. Dinner consisted of
soup, beans and potatoes. After dinner I returned to the
yard until 5:45 p.m. The time in the yard was spent walking
or occupied in the gardens. Under an oak tree I met a man
with a most curious mania. He imagined that his head was
made of glass and that by some unconscious movement, he
might break his head. When he walked he carried his head in
a very proper manner. When things were thrown at him, he
fell into a most peculiar fright. In addition, the manner in
which he took care of his head was most troubling indeed. At
6:00 p.m. supper was served, which was bread and tea. After
supper, I was taken immediately to bed, back to the hard bed
made of straw.1
According to existing manuscripts, daily experiences like
the one articulated above, were typical of a patient who
lived in the Stockton State Mental Asylum during the late
19th and early 20th centuries. However, not everyone living
in insane asylums during this time period experienced the
same conditions. Interpretations of the treatment regimen of
the patients at the asylum vary from harmful and oppressive,
to peaceful and tranquil: a day that was filled with
simplicity. It was this simplicity on which the Stockton
State Mental Asylum prided itself. The asylum served as a
place for those deemed mentally unstable to live their lives
as normal as possible, with the hopes of someday recovering
and reentering society. The road to recovery was not just
solely dependant on the patients, but rather included a
complicated network of professionals both trained and
employed by the state hospital.
At the top of the hierarchy of professional employees of the
state asylum was the superintendent, the overseer of the
hospital. In other words, nothing happened without his or
her permission. The superintendent oversaw the building
improvements as well as the care of the hospital’s patients.
The superintendent was also in charge of dictating the
different job descriptions throughout he asylum. For
example, he or she would determine what the job of each
attendant would entail. Most importantly, the superintendent
had the final say as to whether or not a patient would be
admitted. Along with the decisions of admittance came the
superintendent’s log. The log was a biannual report
submitted by the superintendent, which gave the specific
happenings of the past two years. From the 1890’s to the
1920’s the Stockton State Asylum had a total of three
superintendents by the names of Asa Clark, the founder, his
son Fred Clark, and finally Margaret Smythe.2
Dr. Asa Clark was the original superintendent of the
Stockton
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
Dr.
Asa Clark
Courtesy of the Bank of
Stockton Historical Photo Collection |
| |
State Mental Asylum and was also responsible for setting the
benevolent precedent that would be followed for the rest of
the asylum’s existence. “In reviewing the officials who have
devoted their energies and best efforts to some particular
department of the state government, there is no one who
stands out more prominently than Dr. Asa Clark, the honored
Superintendent of the State Hospital at Stockton.”3
In addition to being the first superintendent of the
hospital he was also responsible for starting the Pacific
Hospital, another local mental hospital that specialized in
the care of the mentally ill through exposure to nature and
comfortable surroundings. Not only did the Pacific State
Asylum house the San Joaquin Valley’s mentally ill, but took
on the daunting task of taking care of the mentally ill from
Nevada and Arizona as well. Later on in Clark’s life, the
Pacific State Asylum merged with the Stockton State Mental
Asylum as Clark took over. In 1906, Asa Clark’s son, Fred
Clark took control of the State Asylum as the
superintendent. During Fred Clark’s reign as the
superintendent he really made no innovations in the care of
the mentally ill, rather, simply kept the asylum running the
same way his father did.4
However, this was not the case when Margaret Smythe took
over the facility in 1929.
Dr. Margaret Smythe was the first woman to be hired as a
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
Dr.
Margaret Smythe
Courtesy of the Bank of
Stockton Historical Photo Collection |
| |
superintendent in the United States as a nationally
recognized psychiatrist. “First Female Superintendent” was
not the only “first” on Dr. Smythe’s resume. Dr. Smythe was
also the first doctor to use insulin shots on patients as
well as the first to eliminate the derogatory words “asylum”
and “insane” from the name of her hospital. When Dr. Smythe
retired from the superintendents position at the state
hospital she was thought to have done more for the mentally
ill and the field of psychiatric medicine than anyone in the
past.5
Although the superintendents had an enormous workload, the
assistant physicians had the closest doctor-patient
relationship. The assistant physicians were each assigned a
particular ward, either a building in the women’s ward or
the men’s ward. The assistant physicians were responsible
for the everyday care of their patients. The assistant
physicians treated everything from mental illness to the
common cold. The physicians were responsible for daily
checkups on their patients as well as detailed reports that
were turned in to the superintendent.6
Next in the hierarchy of employment were the attendants. The
attendants were responsible for taking care of the practical
needs of the patients. For example, they washed and dried
patients’ clothing as well as bed garments. The attendants
performed their duties by a simple motto: “do to others, as
you would wish other to do to you.” By no right were the
attendants allowed to strike or harm a patient; this was a
direct result of the institutions strict policy on patient
treatment. Attendants emphasized the nonviolent approach to
patient care, which is not something one would quickly
associate with psychiatric care during the time period. In
addition to the code of non-violence, the attendants were to
follow strict behavioral guidelines while they were on duty.
These included things like no socializing. The rule of no
socializing encapsulated the idea that an attendants time at
the institution should be devoted to bettering the lives of
the patients, not themselves. However, hospital employees
were not the only people involved with the institution that
had to follow strict rules.
Visitors were instructed to follow very strict rules.
Visitors were not allowed to give anything to the patients
for fear that they would give them some type of weapon or
escape tool. In addition, the visitors were not allowed to
touch any of the outside gardens or flowerbeds because they
were for the use of the patients. The fact that the hospital
had visitors, not to mention a set of rules for them
highlights that the local community came and visited the
mental asylum. In one surviving photograph, a local marching
band came to play outside the men’s ward of the asylum.7
This fact indicates that the asylum was not frowned upon by
the local community, but rather embraced. This embracing of
the mentally ill was not just seen in the community, but
rather in the actual ideology of patient care.
The state asylum adopted a sort of benevolence in asylum
management. The goal for the asylum was to make life for the
patients as peaceful and simplistic as possible. The
ultimate goal for the state asylum was to rid the public of
any negative connotations it had against asylums and their
treatment of patients. “Everywhere there is an upward
tendency toward improved comforts for the insane, and the
emendation of the condition of those housed in asylums, and
at the same time the distrust with which the public has
heretofore viewed asylum management is fast passing away.”8
The aforementioned statement is an example of how much
emphasis the asylum placed on taking care of its patients,
for their sake and for the sake of the reputation held by
the community. The idea of benevolence stemmed from the idea
that those working at the asylum not only had a duty to the
patients to run an upstanding institution, but also had a
duty to themselves and their community.
However, the Stockton asylum’s exercise of benevolence and
non-violence was not commonplace in the rest of the nation’s
treatment of the mentally ill. In 1900, a man by the name of
Clifford Beers was admitted to a private Connecticut insane
asylum where his treatment was very different. “At the mercy
of untrained, incompetent attendants, he was subject to
degrading treatment and mental and physical abuses.”9
For its time, the Stockton State Mental Asylum was a
progressive institute that sought to truly serve the best
interests of its patients in contrast to other institutions
around the world. After Beers was released in 1908, he
started a movement to change the face of mental illness and
the care of the mentally ill. He had three goals in mind: 1)
to improve attitudes toward mental illness and the mentally
ill, 2) to improve services for the mentally ill, and 3) to
work for the prevention of mental illness and promote mental
health.10 The novelty of
the Stockton asylum can largely be attributed to the early
Progressive movement during this time period, a time of
reform and change for the better. The Progressive movement
was especially strong in California and sought social reform
through temperance and awareness.11
Ironically, all three of these ideas had been implemented at
the Stockton State Asylum since its creation, again
highlighting the progressive nature of the asylum.
During this time period, the ratio of those deemed insane to
those who were sane was 1 in 370 people. One may ask who was
determining whether or not someone was insane, or more
importantly, how was one diagnosed. When undergoing the
admittance process there were generally two questions that
had to be answered. First, was the person insane? Secondly,
was the case of insanity a danger to the prospective patient
or the community? If both of these questions were answered
in the affirmative then another series of questions began to
determine the exact disease and cause from which the patient
suffered. However, simply being diagnosed with some type of
dementia or mania was simply not enough to be admitted. If
one was diagnosed with a mania or type of dementia, there
had to be proof of danger to society. This notion says a
great deal about the responsibility the hospital had to the
surrounding community. The hospital had a great deal to do
with keeping the community of Stockton safe from potentially
harmful people, a relationship that was greatly appreciated
by the Stockton public. As Dr. Asa Clark stated, “No case of
idiocy, imbecility, simple feebleness of intellect, or old
case of harmless dementia, or of any class of incurable and
harmless insanity, or of delirium tremens, shall be sent to
the asylum.”12 Clark’s
statement touches on the fact that the prime concern for the
institution was to make sure a person was not harmful to
society. If that person was deemed harmless, then he or she
was released to society. Once a person was admitted, there
were a number of treatments that one could undergo.
The asylum in Stockton was progressive for the time, but
remained limited by the lack of medical and diagnostic
technologies. Psychopathology was the overarching practice
at the State Asylum in Stockton during the late 1800’s and
the early 1900’s. Psychopathology is the behavioral study of
mental illness. Behavioral study was virtually all that was
available due to the lack of medical technology available at
the time. In addition to psychopathology, hydrotherapy was
often used inside the Stockton asylum for patient care and
rehabilitation. Hydrotherapy is by definition the treatment
of a patient through the use of water of differing
temperature. Patients were soaked in water in order to
alleviate their pains and symptoms. Although the water did
very little for the actual disease itself, it helped the
patients to relax, a healing technique heavily used by the
institution. Along with hydrotherapy, music therapy was also
used a great deal by the state asylum. Music was often
playing in the institution to create a very peaceful
environment, one that evoked simplicity. Quite often, the
Masonic Temple band would come and play at the institution
as seen in a number of the institutions photographs.13
The band would start at the entrance of the asylum and play
while walking around the grounds. Not only did music come
from outside the institution, but also patients were
encouraged to take up the playing of instruments. This
provided the benefits of music therapy for patients but also
gave them something to do with their spare time. The
constant playing of music by outsiders, as well as those
inside the institution, was encouraged and highlights that
fact that the physicians in charge of the institution had
enormous confidence in the music therapy approach to curing
mental illness. Finally, the most common form of therapy for
the patients in the mental asylum was work. “The chief aids
in the restoration to mental health,” argued Clark, “are
occupation and diversion. Daily confinement in the wards and
yards with nothing to occupy the mind is tedious in the
extreme.”14 Thus, the head
physicians at the hospital encouraged their patients to work
daily, whether it was in their rooms or in the gardens. In
fact, the heads of the hospital ideally wanted the
institution to be a self-sufficient entity: all clothes,
food, and other necessities would come from the hospital
grounds, made largely by the patients. Thus, work gave the
patients something to occupy themselves and at the same time
helped administrators run the hospital more economically and
efficiently. Most of the gardens were located near the wards
to prevent the patients from running off, however, the heads
of the hospital ultimately wanted the entire plot of land,
all remaining 10-acres, to be cultivated, thus assuring the
self-survival of the institution and its members. In
addition, the constant work by the patients would help them
later on if re-admittance to mainstream society were in
their future.15 In essence,
the hospital was benefiting itself through employment of its
patients but also benefiting society by turning out
productive citizens. This idea of citizenship leads us to
the relationship the hospital had with the surrounding
community.
From the hospital’s beginning the community and hospital
interacted with each other. For example, the frequent visits
of the Masonic Temple band indicates that not only did
community members feel safe at the asylum, but also that
they went out of their way to help those inside. In
addition, the minutes of the meetings of the hospital’s
Board of Directors were printed in the Stockton Independent.
For example, a decision on what type of coal to use for
heating and other purposes was printed on May 8, 1888, which
indicates that the community was interested in the decisions
being made internally at the hospital.16
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
The
Pacific Hospital, 1871
Courtesy of the Bank of
Stockton Historical Photo Collection |
| |
In addition, the doctors mentioned in the transcripts at
Holt-Atherton were well-respected physicians in the
community because of their work inside the insane asylum.
Community support of the hospital was not only programmatic,
but also came through infrastructure. There were several
roads, for example, that led to the asylum, which would
indicate that carriages as well as electric cars maintained
by the city frequented the asylum. Maintenance of these
access roads and electric car tracks required a fair amount
of money, underscoring an important commitment to the asylum
by the city and the citizens. However, the local community
was not the only one involved with the Stockton State
Asylum. As mentioned before, the mentally insane from Nevada
as well as Arizona were housed at the state asylum
indicating there was a west coast cooperation of states for
the care of the mentally insane. However, the most apparent
example of the asylum’s responsiveness to community came in
1906. That year was the year of the San Francisco earthquake
and fire, during which the mental hospital in San Francisco
was completely destroyed. After the earthquake, all of the
surviving members of the San Francisco asylum were
transferred to the asylum in Stockton. This event not only
signifies the community of trust embodied in the asylum but
the willingness of the asylum to take on the care of the
mentally ill from other communities. Although the admittance
of nearly 100 new patients caused overcrowding in the
asylum, there was still the attempt to take on the
challenge.
The aforementioned ideas are all positive reflections of the
Stockton State Asylum; there were however, negative beliefs
as well. The notion of overcrowding was a huge concern taken
on daily by the heads at the Stockton State Mental Asylum.
During the late 19th century the asylum had taken on more
that its maximum patient capacity. The asylum’s capacity was
1,150 and in 1888 the asylum housed some 1,647 patients, 497
patients greater than the stated capacity. This number was
largely due to the over abundance of incoming patients, many
of whom were not necessarily insane, but kept on the
premises because of requests by family members or friends.
Analyst John R. Sutton of the University of California,
Santa Barbara argues that the overpopulation of insane
asylums during this time period was not a result of an
increase in the number of those diagnosed insane, but rather
the inability of the government to deal with those in
poverty. He argues that legislation restructured the
requirements for admittance to these institutions so that
they were able to take care of the elderly, poor and
incapable, not necessarily just the insane.18
Consequently, places like the Stockton insane asylum
ultimately ended up caring for such individuals. The
superintendents often argued against overcrowding. As Clark
stated, “To overcrowd the insane is to impair the usefulness
of the asylum and subvert good management.” Employment of
its patients and methods of curing were deeply affected by
overcrowding the asylum. With all the new patients, there
were less jobs and fewer patients and ways for patients to
achieve the tranquility and simplicity that made the
Stockton Asylum so favored and respected. In addition, some
argued that overcrowding led to neglect of the well being of
the patients, even resulting in mistreatment, either by
staff or simply because of absence of adequate food and
water.
In 1888, the San Francisco Examiner, a well-respected
newspaper on the West Coast, sent an undercover reporter in
to the Stockton State Mental Asylum under the fictional
diagnosis of lunacy. The reporter was to find out the truth
about the asylum and the alleged mistreatment
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
"Asylum Gang"
Illustration by Ralph O. Yardley, a local artist and
historian of Stockton
Courtesy of the Bank of
Stockton Historical Photo Collection |
| |
of its patients. He was admitted and spent several weeks in
the asylum getting to know its structure and behavior, both
its patients and its employees. However, when the reporter
was inside, he found that none of the stereotypes believed
by the public were actually true; in fact, the asylum was
well run and well kept. “During my stay at the asylum I
heard of only two cases of actual cruelty,” he wrote, “…both
of these acts were in direct and flagrant violation of the
rules of the asylum, which provide that, “a blow or a kick
is never to be inflicted on a patient by any employee under
any circumstances. Any violation of this rule will subject
the offender to instant dismissal.”19
The report underscores the strict rules and regulations of
the asylum and underlines that the reporter was impressed
when he left the asylum, because he had only witnessed two
brutalities when the general public, himself included, had
imagined a place of shear cruelty. As far as cleanliness was
concerned the reporter also found his prior beliefs of dirty
and unsanitary conditions to be false. “The asylum in
appearance is a model of cleanliness. The floors are swept
and scrubbed every morning by some of the patients, under
the direction of the attendants. This service is not
compulsory, only such patients performing it as
volunteer…the doctor dwelt strongly on the importance of
some properly adapted form of occupation as a means of cure
and the evil of the opposite condition of utter idleness.”20
The reporter entered a skeptic and left a believer. He had
been impressed by the actions of both the staff and the
patients at the Stockton State Mental Asylum during his
visit.
The progressive attitude towards the treatment of the
Stockton Asylum’s patients was what made it so special,
especially for the late 1800’s and early 1900’s.
| |
| |
 |
|
| |
The
Masonic Temple Band marching and playing outside of
the Stockton State Asylum
Courtesy of the Bank of
Stockton Historical Photo Collection |
| |
In fact, the asylum was not only progressive for its time
but was years ahead of some of its peers, like the asylum in
Connecticut. The asylum in Stockton not only instilled a
sense of community in its members but also welcomed the
support of the surrounding community outside the hospital.
The community was involved on a superficial level (in terms
of tolerance of the hospital and its patients) and at a very
personal level (as seen in the photographs of the Masonic
Temple band). In addition, the asylum in Stockton was not
only a reflection of the community, but rather a model of
what was going on during the time on a national basis, both
politically and economically embodied by the Progressive
movement. As we have seen, many of the social and political
norms of the time, such as social awareness, were well
represented in the asylum during the 1890’s and the 1920’s.
Bibliography
1. San Francisco Examiner, no date available,
Oullahan Scrapbook, MS 194, Box 15, (Holt-Atherton Special
Collections. University of the Pacific), 1.
2. “Asa Clark,” History of the New California Its
Resources and People, Volume 1, Retrieved from the World
Wide Web on October 26, 2002,
http://www.usgennet.org/usa/ca/state1/biographies/aclark.html.
3. “Asa Clark,” History of the New California,
Retrieved from the World Wide Web on October 26, 2002,
http://www.usgennet.org/usa/ca/state1/biographies/aclark.html.
4. Ibid.
5. “NMHA and the History of the Mental Health Movement,”
National Mental Health Association,
http://www.nmha.org/about/history.cfm.
6. Stockton Insane Asylum, Rules and Regulations of the
Stockton Insane Asylum at Stockton, CA, (Sacramento, CA:
Office of State Printing, 18880.
7. Photograph Courtesy of the Bank of Stockton Archive.
8. Dr. Asa Clark, Biennial Report of the Directors and
the Thirty-Ninth and Fortieth Annual Reports of the
Superintendents of the Insane Asylum of the State of
California At Stockton for the Two Years Ending June 30,
1882, (Sacramento, CA: Office of State Printing, 1882),
14.
9. “NMHA and the History of the Mental Health Movement,”
National Mental Health Association,
http://www.nmha.org/about/history.cfm.
10. “NMHA and the History of the Mental Health Movement”
11. James J. Rawls and Walton Bean, California: An
Interpretive History, (Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 1998).
12. Dr. Asa Clark, Biennial Report of the Directors and
the Thirty-Fifth and Thirty-Sixth Annual Reports of the
Superintendents of the Insane Asylum of the State of
California At Stockton for the Two Years Ending June 30,
1888, (Sacramento, CA: Office of State Printing, 1888),
14.
13. Photograph Courtesy of the Bank of Stockton Archive.
14. Dr. Asa Clark, Biennial Report of the Directors and
the Thirty-Ninth and Fortieth Annual Reports of the
Superintendents of the Insane Asylum of the State of
California At Stockton for the Two Years Ending June 30,
1882, (Sacramento, CA: Office of State Printing, 1882),
14.
15. “NMHA and the History of the Mental Health Movement,”
National Mental Health Association,
http://www.nmha.org/about/history.cfm.
16. Stockton Independent, May 8, 1888, 3.
17. John R. Sutton, “The Political Economy of Madness: The
Expansion of the Asylum in Progressive America,” American
Sociological Review, Vol. 56, No. 5, (Oct., 1991),
665-678.
18. Dr. Asa Clark, Biennial Report of the Directors and
the Thirty-Fifth and Thirty-Sixth Annual Reports of the
Superintendents of the Insane Asylum of the State of
California At Stockton for the Two Years Ending June 30,
1888, (Sacramento, CA: Office of State Printing, 1888),
14.
19. San Francisco Examiner, no date available,
Oullahan Scrapbook, MS 194, Box 15, (Holt-Atherton Special
Collections, University of the Pacific).
20. San Francisco Examiner, no date available,
Oullahan Scrapbook, MS 194, Box 15, (Holt-Atherton Special
Collections, University of the Pacific).
|